论文部分内容阅读
刑事诉讼证明责任,原则上由原告承担,被告人不承担证明责任。但是,针对一些特殊的犯罪,或者犯罪中的某些特殊情节等,对犯罪构成中的某部分要件事实的证明责任由被告人承担则具有其一定的合理性。虽然在有些特定的情况下,被告方应承担一定的证明责任,但是与原告相比,二者在证明责任的性质、承担的时间顺序、证明的全面性、证明对象、证明标准等方面都存在非常大的差异,有着质的区别。
The burden of proof in criminal proceedings, in principle, by the plaintiff, the defendant does not assume the burden of proof. However, for some special crimes or some special episodes of crime, the burden of proving the facts of certain elements in the composition of crimes is justified by the defendant. Although the defendants should bear certain burden of proof in some specific cases, both of them have the same nature of the burden of proof, the order of time, the comprehensiveness of the proof, the object of proof and the standard of proof as compared with the plaintiff Very big difference, there is a qualitative difference.