论文部分内容阅读
随着司法实践的不断深入,尤其是当前我国死刑政策发生重大转变之际,死刑指定辩护能否满足“保留死刑,严格控制和慎重适用死刑”政策的要求,指定辩护的实际运行效果如何,引起了人们的思考。当死刑复核权收归最高人民法院后,该问题更是引起了最高人民法院领导和决策者的关注。应通过实证的方式对死刑指定辩护的运行现状进行考查,总结经验,分析成败得失;应将指定辩护向侦查、审查起诉阶段前移,采用集中式为主、撒网式为辅的方式指定辩护人,从而提高辩护的专业化水平。
With the continuous deepening of judicial practice, especially when the current death penalty policy in our country has undergone a major change, can the designated death penalty be able to meet the requirements of the “death penalty, strict control and the careful application of the death penalty” policy, and how the actual operation of the designated defense , Aroused people’s thinking. After the right of death penalty review to the Supreme People’s Court, the issue even aroused the concern of the Supreme People’s Court leaders and policy makers. The status quo of the designated defense of the death penalty should be examined empirically and summing up experience to analyze success or failure. The designated defense should be moved forward to the stage of investigation and prosecution and prosecution. The defender should be designated as centralized and supplemented , Thereby enhancing the professional level of defense.