这位集伪君子、假道学、正经面孔、花花肠子于一身的朱晦庵,在思想领域中所起到的长期的消极作用,是为害甚广、流毒甚远的。清初思想家颜元对他的批判有过一针见血的说法:“千余年来,率天下入故纸中,耗尽身心气力,作弱人、病人、无用人者,皆晦庵为之也。”(《朱子语类评》) This longstanding negative role played by the hypocrite, the Taoist school, the decent face, and the intestines of flowers and intestines, in the field of thought, is extremely devastating and far-reaching. In the early Qing Dynasty, Yan Yuan, a thinker, had a sharp criticism of his criticism: “For more than a thousand years, the world has run into the wrong paper, exhausting the mental and physical strength, making it a weak person, a sick person and a useless person. . ”(“ Zhu Zi category review ”)