论文部分内容阅读
在实定法的维度内,行政裁量形式上可以分为行政法外的与行政法内的、绝对的与相对的。行政法外的行政裁量是指不受行政法效力控制的绝对行政裁量;行政法内的行政裁量则是指具有合法与合理双重属性且可辩驳的行政裁量。由于辩驳的结果只有在行政法内并成为合法性问题才有法律意义,否则就属于绝对行政裁量,所以“合法”、“合理”并存的观点、关于“合法但存在合理性问题”的表述,皆混淆了行政裁量的绝对性与相对性,因而存在混乱和错误。
In the dimension of positive law, the form of administrative discretion can be divided into absolute and relative within administrative law and administrative law. The administrative discretion outside administrative law refers to the absolute administrative discretion which is not controlled by the effective of administrative law. The administrative discretion in administrative law refers to the administrative discretion with the dual attribute of lawfulness and reasonableness. Since the result of the rebuttal only has legal significance within the law of law and becomes a question of legality, otherwise it belongs to the absolute administrative discretion, so the view that “legal” and “reasonable” coexist and “legal but reasonable Problem ”expression, all confuse the absolute and relative of administrative discretion, so there is confusion and error.