民事诉讼法(试行)第103条规定:“人民法院审理民事案件,除涉及国家机密、个人隐私或者法律另有规定的以外,一律公开进行。”但长期以来,一些审判人员习惯于在当事人之间来回奔波,搞背靠背的调查、调解、谈谈劝劝,或者是反复调解无效,经合议庭评议甚至审判委员会讨论决定后,开庭走走形式。结果是:法官两边劝,当事人冷眼看,上诉加申诉,忙得团团转。而办案效果还往往不理想。通过调查分析认为,在开庭中主要存在以下问题:一是审判人员在庭审程序掌握上的主观随意性,导致庭审程序 Article 103 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Provisional) stipulates: “People’s courts shall handle cases in civil cases in public unless they involve state secrets, personal privacy or otherwise provided by law.” However, for a long time, some judicial personnel have become accustomed to engaging in criminal proceedings Go back and forth, engage in back-to-back investigations, mediation, talk to persuade, or repeated mediation invalid, after the collegiate bench review or even trial committee to discuss the decision, the court walk form. The result: Judges advise on both sides, the parties cold-willed, appeals plus complaints, too busy to turn around. The handling effect is often not ideal. According to the investigation and analysis, the following problems exist mainly in the hearing: one is the subjective arbitrariness of the judicial personnel in the trial procedure, leading to the trial procedure