近几年来,学术界常有一些新鲜话题出现,一是学术规范和思想哪个更重要,二是学术的实践品格。第二个问题的提出实在太过离奇,大概只要是学者都知道,学术规范只不过是学者用来解构问题、表达学者思想的一种工具或一种解释体系而已。如果学者对其学术研究没有倾注思想,那学术研究的水平又从何体现?学者成就的大小,不仅在于其用来阐释其思想 In recent years, academic circles often have some fresh topics appearing. First, which academic norms and ideology is more important, and second, academic practical character. The second question is too bizarre, presumably scholars all know that academic norms are only scholars to deconstruct the problem, a tool for scholars to express or an explanation system only. If scholars do not devote their academic research to ideology, what is the level of academic research? The magnitude of a scholar’s accomplishments lies not only in the fact that it is used to explain his ideas