论文部分内容阅读
在各种因素的影响下,现行乡镇政权的运行机制已陷入困境,各种针对乡镇体制改革的方案在理论界被纷纷提出,其中以“强化乡镇体制”、“县政乡派”、“乡镇自治”三种为主要代表观点。本文通过对乡镇现存弊端评析、三种主要改革观点的比较分析,试图论证“乡镇有限自治”是最好的改革路径,并从法律分权制、乡镇长直选和民主合作制等方面对乡镇有限自治模式予以制度设计。通过新的制度构建,期望能为乡镇摆脱当前困境,推动基层民主法制建设,建立和谐合理的基层政权体制发挥作用。
Under the influence of various factors, the operating mechanism of the current township and town regime has been in a dilemma. Various schemes aimed at the reform of the township and town system have been put forward in theoritical circles. Among them, the “township and town system strengthening” Autonomy “three kinds as the main representative point of view. This article tries to prove that ”limited autonomy of villages and towns" is the best way to reform through the analysis of the existing defects of villages and towns and the comparison of the three major reform perspectives. And from the point of legal decentralization, direct election of township leaders and democratic cooperation, Autonomy mode to be system design. Through the new system construction, it is hoped that it will play a role for the towns and villages to get rid of the current predicament, promote the building of democracy and the legal system at the grassroots level, and establish a harmonious and reasonable grassroots political power system.