苏联作者?达尼洛夫和?雅库波夫斯卡娅在今年苏联出版的“历史问题”第5划上发表了“史料学和苏联社会史的研究”一文.文中指出:理论史料学中具有特殊意义的问题是确定“历史史料”的概念,阐明史料分类的原则以及探讨批判史料的原则.在解决史料的概念这样一个基本的方法论问题时,资产阶级史料学明显地表现出它在科学上的无能为力.在这里作者举出了俄国最知名的研究史料学理论的资产阶级历史学家A.C.拉波-达尼列夫斯基为例.A.C.拉波-达尼列夫斯基从新康德主义的概念出发,把心理和现实的存在对立起来.作者指出,在研究过去的文献时,诸如把“史料”和“现象”分割开来,脱离 Soviet Union author Danilov and Yakubovskaya published a paper entitled “Studies of Historical Materials and the Social History of the Soviet Union” in the 5th issue of “Historical Issues” published by the Soviet Union this year. The issue of special significance in theoretical historiography is to define the concept of historical material, to clarify the principle of classification of historical materials and to explore the principles of critical historical materials.In the process of resolving such a basic methodological issue as the concept of historical materials, the bourgeois historiography is obvious To show its scientific powerlessness. Here the author cites the most famous historical data theory of the study of the Bourgeois historian AC Rapo - Danielovski as an example. Fawski sets out from the concept of neo-Kantianism to oppose the existence of psychology and reality.The author points out that when studying the past literature, such as separating the historical data and the phenomena,