论文部分内容阅读
目的:探究保肛手术与传统Mile手术在直肠癌手术中的效果对比。方法:在本次研究中选择2013年5月-2015年7月我院收治的87例直肠癌患者为研究对象,按照治疗方式的差异性,将其分为甲组和乙组,甲组43例患者,乙组44例患者。甲组采用保肛手术进行治疗,乙组采用传统Mile手术进行治疗,对临床疗效进行对比分析。结果:在本次研究中,甲组的手术时间、住院时间、术后排气时间均小于乙组,各项数据比较结果差异性明显,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。甲组的不良反应率为4.6%,乙组的不良反应率为13.6%,甲组的不良反应率明显高于乙组,比较结果差异性明显,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:对直肠癌患者采用保肛手术进行治疗,其安全性比较高,能有效提升患者术后生活质量,值得临床推广和应用。
Objective: To investigate the effect of sphincter preserving surgery and traditional Mile surgery in rectal cancer surgery. Methods: A total of 87 patients with rectal cancer admitted to our hospital from May 2013 to July 2015 were selected as study subjects. According to the difference of treatment methods, they were divided into Group A and Group B, Group A 43 Cases of patients, B group 44 patients. Group A anal sphincter preservation treatment, Group B using the traditional Mile surgery for treatment, comparative analysis of clinical efficacy. Results: In this study, the operation time, hospital stay and postoperative exhaust time of Group A were all less than those of Group B, and the results of the data were significantly different (P <0.05). The rate of adverse reactions in group A was 4.6%, the rate of adverse reactions in group B was 13.6%. The rate of adverse reactions in group A was significantly higher than that in group B. The difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: The treatment of rectum cancer patients with anal sphincter preservation, its safety is relatively high, can effectively improve the postoperative quality of life of patients, it is worth clinical promotion and application.