论文部分内容阅读
在对外国判决承认与执行上,长期以来各国坚持严格的司法主权原则,因而一国法院判决在其他国家并不具有当然的法律效力。“判决为一国司法权之实施。而主权之行使,除有条约规定外仅限于本国境内,故判决当无域外效力,不能强求他国承认有既判力。”因而,一国法院判决如果需要发生真正的效力,起到确定当事人权利义务关系的实际效果,则需要请求其他国家法院进行承认与执行。尽管从理论分析上可得出良好且让人满意的结果,国际社会在外国判决的承认与执行上能够加强国际合作,从而获得一个对于当事人以及各国都有积极意义、至少是次优的良性结果。但是,当今国际社会的现实并非如此,甚至是正好相反,各国在外国判决的承
In recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments, all countries have for a long time adhered to the principle of strict judicial sovereignty. Therefore, judgments of a country’s courts do not have the legal effect of force in other countries. “The judgments for the implementation of a country’s jurisdiction, and the exercise of sovereignty, except with the treaty provisions confined to their own territory, the verdict is that when there is no extraterritorial effect, can not force his country to recognize the res judicata.” Thus, a country’s court ruled that if necessary If the actual effect occurs and the actual effect of determining the rights and obligations of the parties concerned will be sought, the courts in other countries will be required to request recognition and enforcement. Despite good and satisfactory results from theoretical analysis, the international community can strengthen international cooperation in the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments so as to obtain a benign outcome, at least sub-optimal, for both parties and countries . However, the reality of today’s international community is not the case. Even the opposite is true.