论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析研究妇产科急性大出血临床治疗中采用介入治疗的效果。方法:妇产科急性大出血病患共计80例,随机将其分为治疗组和对照组,两组患者各40例,针对治疗组采用介入性动脉栓塞治疗,针对对照组则采用髂内动脉结扎术或子宫切除术,这两种手术方式均属于传统治疗术,然后对治疗组和对照组患者进行数据的比较,主要包括对其出血量、手术时间、是否切除子宫、是否出现死亡情况、是否有任何并发症的情况发生,对两组病患的以上情况加以比较。结果:相比较出血量、阴道流血时间和手术时间来说,治疗组低于对照组,该差异具有统计学意义。另外,通过对患者子宫切除率、死亡率和并发症发生率进行比较,明显发现治疗组低于对照组。结论:介入性动脉栓塞治疗具有给患者造成的创伤小、能够迅速止血、出现并发症的情况少、患者的出血量也相对较少、还具有可保留子宫的优点,对于患者的症状可以加以有效控制,不仅能够缩短治疗时间,对妇产科急性大出血也有显著的疗效,因而其临床应用价值较高。
Objective: To analyze the effect of interventional therapy in the clinical treatment of acute hemorrhage in obstetrics and gynecology. Methods: Obstetrics and gynecology patients with acute hemorrhage a total of 80 cases were randomly divided into treatment group and control group, 40 patients in both groups, for the treatment group by interventional arterial embolization for the control group was the internal iliac artery ligation Surgery or hysterectomy, both of which are traditional treatments, and then compare the data of the treatment group and the control group patients, including the amount of bleeding, the operation time, whether the uterus is removed, whether death occurs, whether Any complications occurred, compared to the above two groups of patients to be compared. Results: The treatment group was lower than the control group in terms of bleeding volume, vaginal bleeding time and operation time, and the difference was statistically significant. In addition, by comparing the incidence of hysterectomy, mortality, and complication rates in patients, the treatment group was clearly found to be lower than the control group. CONCLUSION: Interventional arterial embolization has the advantages of less trauma to the patient, rapid hemostasis, fewer complications, less bleeding, and the ability to retain the uterus, which can be effective in treating patients’ symptoms Control, not only can shorten the treatment time, acute bleeding in obstetrics and gynecology have significant effect, so its clinical value is higher.