论文部分内容阅读
民主的集体所有制已经走到尽头。它最基本的劣势,和国有企业一样,是所有者不到位。在这种企业里只有经营者,没有所有者。所有者和经营者追求的东西不同:经营者追求的是规模、短期效益、在职消费、分配;所有者追求的是效益、积累、投资、降低成本。在一个健康的经济实体里,两种追求应该形成制衡。这是现代企业制度规范管理的基础。但在四通这样的高新技术企业中,没有这种制衡,不可能建立比较规范的管理。要往前发展,一定要解决这个问题。产权改造的“三座大山”1997年底到1998年全年,四通
The democratic collective ownership has come to an end. Its basic disadvantage, like state-owned enterprises, is that the owner is not in place. In this kind of business there are only operators and no owners. Owners and managers pursue different things: managers pursue scale, short-term benefits, on-the-job consumption, and distribution; owners pursue efficiency, accumulation, investment, and cost reduction. In a healthy economic entity, the two pursuits should form checks and balances. This is the basis for the standard management of modern enterprise systems. However, in high-tech enterprises such as Stone, there is no such checks and balances, and it is impossible to establish relatively standardized management. To advance, we must solve this problem. The “Three Big Mountains” of property rights reform from the end of 1997 to the entire year of 1998