论文部分内容阅读
编辑同志:三天前,一家超市在其店门口打出20种商品降价的促销广告。我根据广告,选择、购买了4箱花生奶,并支付140元费用后,有知情的好友告诉我,这种花生奶原价就是35元/箱,根本没有降价,并出示了其一周前购买的小票加以证明。感觉被愚弄的我,当即返回超市要求给个说法。超市自知理亏,但又置之不理。请问:超市应否对这种表面上是低价,实际上是高价,即“低标高结”的行为承担责任?读者:许栩茹许栩茹读者:’超市必须给予你500元赔偿并受到行政处罚。首先,超市必须作出惩罚
Editor’s Comrade: Three days ago, a supermarket hit a promotional sale of 20 items at its storefront. According to the advertisement, I chose and bought 4 boxes of peanut milk and paid 140 yuan. After informed friends told me that the original price of peanut milk was 35 yuan / box, there was no price reduction at all, Small ticket to prove. I feel fooled, immediately returned to the supermarket to give a statement. Supermarkets know that loss, but ignored. Excuse me: the supermarket should be on the surface of this is a low price, in fact, is a high price, that is, “low-level knot” acts bear the responsibility? Readers: Xu Xu Xu Xu readers: ’The supermarket must give you 500 yuan compensation and administrative penalties . First, supermarkets must punish