论文部分内容阅读
刑事附带民事诉讼,学术界更多的关注精神损害赔偿应当纳入损害赔偿的范围,而然对于当事人和法院来说,如何保障判决的高效便捷执行,是他们都要面对的一个严峻的难题,特别是刑事附带民事裁判中有关财产部分的执行更是法院执行工作中的“难中之难”。尽管在司法实践中,为了附带民事的赔偿的解决,部分地区的司法机关采取在刑事判决之前进行调解,并以此作为考虑被告人量刑的重要因素。但这却在一定程度上导致了公众对司法信赖的下降,而且只是缓解了执行难的困境并没有解决好这一难题。本文尝试从制度层面、内因性因素、司法资源以及司法能力、社会政治等因素分析着手,总结司法实践中的有益实践,提出一些建议,期待理论界与实务界的指正。
Criminal suit incidental civil lawsuit, academic circles pay more attention to compensation for mental damage should be included in the scope of damages, but for the parties and courts, how to ensure the efficient and convenient implementation of the judgments, they all have to face a serious problem, In particular, the enforcement of the part relating to property in criminal incidental civil judgments is even more a “difficult difficulty” in court enforcement. Although in judicial practice, in order to settle civil compensation, judicial authorities in some areas have taken mediation before criminal judgments as an important factor to consider the defendant’s sentence. However, this has, to a certain extent, led to the public’s decline in the trust of the judiciary, but only relieved the difficult position of implementation and did not solve the difficult problem. This article attempts to proceed from the institutional level, internal factors, judicial resources and judicial capabilities, social and political factors such as analysis, summarize the beneficial practices in judicial practice, put forward some suggestions, look forward to the correction of the theoretical and practical circles.