论文部分内容阅读
由中国、澳大利亚和美国征集214名（男111名，女103名）老年人（60～83岁）为本研究受试者。采用Osness等人“60岁以上成人功能素质评定”方法，以及在Duke大学“多项功能评定问卷”基础上经补充和修改的问卷调查表，对受试者进行综合评价。调查结果初步揭示了中、澳、美老年人在社会资源、身体健康状况、体力和智力素质、营养、功能独立情况、日常活动模式及对生活的满意程度等方面的差异。证实了“现场试验”是一组对技术和仪器设备要求不高，适用于老年人口进行身体素质评定的方法。这种“问卷调查表”还需要做进一步的少量修改。它确认了来自世界不同国家的研究人员共同合作，完成有多种纪律约束的研究课题是可行的。
214 (aged 111, 103 female) seniors (aged 60-83) were recruited from China, Australia and the United States as study subjects. Osness et al., “Assessment of functional quality of adults over the age of 60,” and questionnaires based on Duke University’s “multiple functional assessment questionnaire” were supplemented and modified to make a comprehensive evaluation of the subjects. The survey initially revealed the differences in social resources, physical health, physical and mental qualities, nutrition, functional independence, daily activities and satisfaction with life among the elderly in China, Australia and the United States. Confirmed that the “field test” is a set of technical and instrumental equipment is not high, suitable for the elderly population for physical fitness assessment method. This “questionnaire” still needs further minor changes. It confirms that researchers from different countries in the world can work together to complete a research project with a variety of discipline constraints.