论文部分内容阅读
文章根据新文学史料，考察了鲁迅对《学衡》和吴宓批评的全过程，认为那种视1922年鲁迅同“学衡派”的斗争是把吴宓作为反面人物棒喝或鄙夷的说法有欠公允。其时，鲁迅针对《学衡》与新文化运动相逆对的思潮和吴宓的思想局限予以批评是无可厚非的。吴宓作为教育家和学者，一生贡献甚多，建树甚广，其参与创办并主编《学衡》11年，经历始终，在中国文学史和学术上声名远播，影响甚大。吴宓很值得研究。为如何深入研究之，作者提出了三点设想。
Based on the historical data of new literature, the article examines the whole process of Lu Xun’s criticism of “Xueheng” and Wu Mi. According to the theory, Lu Xun’s view that Lu Xun’s struggle with Xueheng School in 1922 is “Wu Heng” Not fair. At the time, it was understandable that Lu Xun criticized the ideological trend of opposing “Xueheng” with the New Culture Movement and Wu Mi’s ideological limitations. As an educator and scholar, Wu Yong contributed a lot in his life and made a great deal of contribution. He participated in the founding and editing of “Xueheng” for 11 years and has always had a great influence on the history and academic of Chinese literature. Wu Yi is worth studying. For how to study in depth, the author put forward three ideas.