论文部分内容阅读
本刊2014年第5期刊登的文章《拖欠劳动报酬争议是否受两年民事诉讼时效限制》(以下简称“原文”)认为,“拖欠工资与克扣工资同为‘拖欠工资’,不能区分仲裁时效而且不受一年劳动仲裁时效或两年民事权利诉讼时效的限制”。笔者对此观点不能认同。原文所举案例中二审法院适用法律得当,只是原文混淆了“拖欠”工资与“克扣”工资的概念。“拖欠”与“克扣”工资是否都不应受一年的仲裁时效限制?根据《劳动争议
Articles published in 2014 fifth issue of the article “Arrears in labor dispute controversy is subject to two years of limitation of civil action limitation” (hereinafter referred to as “the original”) that “the default wage and deduction of wages with the” default “can not Differentiation of arbitration time limitation and not subject to one year labor arbitration limitation or two years of civil rights limitation of limitation ”. I can not agree with this view. In the case cited in the original case, the court of second instance applied the law properly, except that the original text confused the notion of “delinquency” and “deduction” of wages. “Arrears ” and “deduction ” Whether the wages should not be subject to a limitation of arbitration for one year? According to "labor dispute