改革的潮流冲击着高校体育这块地盘,一些传统的观念和做法受到严峻挑战,有必要重新认识。一要突破凯氏模式立足三个面向众所周知,建国初期,凯里舍夫体育教育理论输入我国,不久,各级学校均相继采用凯氏方法进行体育课教学,直到“文革”开始而告一段落。这种体育教学程式,比之旧中国的“自由式”课堂教学要规格得多,对我国学校体育的发展,曾起到了积极的作用。可是,在改革的今天,有些人脑子里头还依依不舍地留恋五十年代凯氏型的那一 The trend of reform has hit this site of college physical education. Some traditional concepts and practices have been harshly challenged and it is necessary to re-understand it. First, to break the Kjeldahl model based on three As we all know, the early Republic, Kaisheifu theory of physical education into our country, and soon, all levels of schools have adopted Kjeldahl method of physical education teaching, until the “Cultural Revolution” and come to an end. This kind of PE teaching program has much more specifications than the “freestyle” classroom teaching in old China and played a positive role in the development of school PE in our country. However, in the reform today, some people are reluctantly reluctant to leave behind the K-type of the 1950s