论文部分内容阅读
《中华人民共和国行政强制法(草案)》已于2005年12月在十届全国人大常委会第十九次会议上经过第一次审议,常委会成员和社会各方面给予了积极肯定,同时存在不少争议,提出许多修改建议,其下一步走向引人注目。我国行政强制立法应坚持平衡理念、兼顾原则和最小侵害原则,在行政强制设定权分配机制、行政决定的强制执行体制、行政强制行为程序等方面,按照现代行政法治原则作出制度安排。这对于有效约束行政强制具有特殊价值,有助于建设法治政府,有利于实现维护公民权益与维护公共利益、尊重个人自由与维持公共秩序、保障公民权利与保障行政权力的辩证统一。几位长期参与行政强制法起草论证工作和行政强制理论研究的专家受邀撰写的本栏目文章,在上述方面提出诸多见解,可为立法机关和关注行政强制立法的读者提供参考。
The Draft Administrative Administrative Compulsion Law of the People’s Republic of China (Draft) was first reviewed in December 2005 at the 19th meeting of the Standing Committee of the 10th NPC Standing Committee. Members of the Standing Committee and various sectors of the society have given positive affirmations and exist simultaneously Quite a lot of controversy, many proposed amendments, the next step to attract attention. China’s administrative mandatory legislation should adhere to the principle of balance, give consideration to the principle and the principle of least violation, and make institutional arrangements in accordance with the principles of the modern administrative rule of law in terms of the administrative allocation of power, the enforcement system of administrative decisions and administrative enforcement procedures. This is of special value for effectively restraining administrative coercion, helping to build a government ruled by law, facilitating the dialectical unification of safeguarding citizens’ rights and interests and safeguarding the public interest, respecting individual freedom and maintaining public order, safeguarding civil rights and guaranteeing administrative power. Several columnists who have been invited to write this column articles for a long time who are involved in the drafting and demonstration of administrative enforcement law and administrative compulsory theoretical research have put forward many opinions in the above aspects and can provide reference for the legislature and readers concerned with the administrative compulsory legislation.