论文部分内容阅读
读了范钧宏同志、高文澜同志合写的《<戏曲艺术的转折与发展>质疑》(下称《质疑》)一文,我感到它涉及戏曲改革若干现实问题,亦涉及戏改政策的一些课题。对戏曲面临的改革问题,展开争鸣,很为必要。《剧本》月刊在《编者的话》中提到《质疑》是“尊重对方的、平等的、说理的学术讨论”。我经仔细思考,却感到并不完全如此。文章轻率地在争论戏曲改革问题的时候。给孟繁树同志几次安上“左”的帽子,不无挖苦之辞义;又缺乏足够分析地指责这位青年理论工作者为“先破后立”,“只讲创新,不
After reading the article “Questioning the Transition and Development of Traditional Chinese Opera” by Comrade Fan Junhong and Comrade Gao Wenlan, I feel that it involves a number of practical issues in the drama reform as well as some topics of dramatization. It is necessary to debate the reform that the opera faces. The “Scripting” magazine mentioned in the “Editor’s Note” that “questioning” is “respect for each other, equality, reasoning academic discussion.” After careful thought, I did not feel that way. The essay arrogantly argued about the issue of drama reform. To give Comrade Meng Fanshu several times to secure a “leftist” hat, without any cynical rhetoric; and lacking enough analysis to accuse the young theoretical worker as “breaking the first,” "talking about innovation, and not