论文部分内容阅读
在回指研究领域的一个普遍共识是处于受话者注意力中心、突显性最高的语篇实体在语篇中再次出现时更倾向于被缩略形式所替代(多数情况下为代词)。因此,在回指解析中的一个关键问题是:哪些因素会影响语篇实体的突显性并帮助受话人对其进行有效评估?Beaver的中心优选理论仅凭句法成分来衡量不同语篇实体的突显程度,这一略显粗糙的做法无疑降低了回指解析的准确率。本文将借助丰富的语例探究信息状态、视角效果、指称形式、平行效应这四个因素对语篇实体突显性的影响,进而将它们转化为制约条件对中心优选理论框架下的评估器进行充实和完善,提升其在回指优选解析中的表现。
A general consensus in the area of anaphora research is that it is at the center of the listener’s attention, and discourse entities most prominent in their discourse tend to be replaced by abbreviated forms (in most cases pronouns). Therefore, one of the key questions in anaphora resolution is: what factors will affect the prominence of the discourse entity and help the caller to evaluate it effectively? Beaver’s theory of center preference uses syntactic components only to measure the effect of different discourse entities Highlight the degree, this slightly rough approach will undoubtedly reduce the accuracy of fingering analysis. This article will explore the influence of the four factors of information state, perspective effect, reference form and parallel effect on the prominence of discourse entities by means of rich examples, and then convert them into constraints to enrich the evaluators in the framework of central preference theory And improve, improve their performance in the analysis of preferred indexing.