在法律问题中,对于事实问题与法律问题进行区分具有一定的价值,在整个法律体系中起着重要的作用。在对其进行界定时,通过本体论或者认识论的角度很难明确,因此,必须采取一定的方法从正确的角度进行分析,避免在区分时产生一定的问题和错误结论。通过对英美法系和大陆法系进行比较分析,可以利用一定的经验和实践基础进行区分,明确二者的联系和区别。本文结合一定的法律知识基础,对事实问题和法律问题进行分析,以明确二者之间的区别。 In legal issues, it is of some value to distinguish between factual issues and legal issues, and plays an important role in the legal system as a whole. When defining it, it is difficult to clarify it from the perspective of ontology or epistemology. Therefore, it is necessary to adopt a certain method to analyze from the correct perspective and avoid producing certain problems and wrong conclusions when distinguishing. Through comparative analysis of Anglo-American law system and civil law system, we can use some experience and practice basis to make a distinction between the two and make clear the difference between them. This article combines certain legal knowledge foundation, analyzes the factual question and the legal question, in order to clarify the difference between the two.