一、问题的提出从认识论的视角出发,司法过程可以分为论证程序和审判程序两个层次,尽管论证程序是一个隐含的、深层次的思维过程,但是它决定了案件的审理结果。这几年的庭审改革,虽然从制度上对实现司法公正起到积极的作用,但从实际的效果来看, 收效甚微。笔者认为,关键原因是法官没有形成法律思维的观 First, the issue raised From the epistemological point of view, the judicial process can be divided into two levels of argument and trial procedures, although the argument procedure is an implicit and deep thinking process, but it determines the outcome of the case. In recent years, the court trial reform has played a positive role in realizing judicial fairness from the system, but the actual effect has little effect. The author believes that the key reason is that judges do not form the concept of legal thinking