我国现行《刑事诉讼法》以及相关的司法解释中都对刑事判决的种类进行了规定。但是文本自身存在模糊和冲突,致使理论界和实务界对于相关规定的认识并不统一。对于变更罪名、证据不足情况下的刑事判决以及证据不足指控罪名不能成立的判决应否成为第三种刑事判决等问题的思考都不仅仅对于实务界有重要意义,而且关乎无罪推定原理之维。 The current Criminal Procedure Law in our country and the related judicial interpretations all stipulate the types of criminal judgments. However, the text itself is vague and conflicting, resulting in the theoretical and practical understanding of the relevant provisions are not uniform. The criminal judgments in the case of lack of evidence, evidence of lack of evidence, or the lack of evidence should not be considered as the third kind of criminal judgments. These reflections are not only of great significance to the practical world but also to the principle of presumption of innocence .