如果法院委托拍卖企业来实施拍卖,拍卖就变成了盈利性拍卖活动,因为拍卖企业要收取佣金,因此这种拍卖活动就必须受拍卖法的规范和约束。有观点认为,拍卖法没有将司法强制拍卖纳入到拍卖法的调整范围之内,因此,司法强制拍卖不受拍卖法的约束。这种现象多年来被认为正确的观点,其实是错误的。之所以会有这种错误认识, If the court entrusts the auction company to conduct the auction, the auction becomes a for-profit auction because the auction company charges a commission, and therefore such auction activity must be governed by and regulated by the auction law. The view is that the auction law does not include judicial compulsory auction into the scope of the adjustment of the auction law, therefore, the judicial compulsory auction is not subject to the auction law. The view that this phenomenon has been considered correct for many years is in fact wrong. The reason why there will be such a mistake,