论文部分内容阅读
目的了解米非司酮配伍米索前列醇和米非司酮配伍利凡诺应用于中期妊娠引产的两种方法的效果比较。方法随机选择中期妊娠妇女105例。口服米非司酮,阴道放置米索前列醇52例。口服米非司酮羊腹腔注射利凡诺53例。结果两组成功率均为100%。产后出血差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),清宫率(P<0.01),用药至胎儿娩出时间(P<0.01)。结论口服米非司酮阴道放置米索前列醇应用于中期妊娠引产的效果优于口服米非司酮羊膜腔注射利凡诺。
Objective To compare the efficacy of mifepristone with misoprostol and mifepristone with rivanol in the induction of labor during the second trimester of pregnancy. Methods A total of 105 middle-term pregnant women were randomly selected. Oral mifepristone vaginal misoprostol placed in 52 cases. Oral mifepristone lamb intraperitoneal injection of rivanol in 53 cases. Results The success rate of both groups was 100%. There was no significant difference in postpartum hemorrhage (P> 0.05). The rate of hysteroscopy (P <0.01) and the time of delivery to fetus (P <0.01). Conclusion Oral mifepristone vaginal placement of misoprostol for induction of labor in the second trimester is superior to the oral administration of mifepristone rivanol.