戴震是清代考據學者的代表人物,其解經方法論鮮明、系統而凝煉,在後世學界也最具爭議性。一般都將其解經方法論解讀爲由實入虚、由部分到整體的單向方法,是一種脱離現實,特别是排斥讀者主體性的純文本主義,這就忽略了其“以心相遇”的體認面向,從而增加了今日“後續的漢宋之争”中一些無謂的争論。而且,如果批評戴震單向方法論和文本主義時自身却真的陷入了純文本主義,則更加不利於戴學研究的深入。一戴震治學自身的語用學維度戴震於乾隆十四或十五年①二十七八歲所作之 Dai Zhen is a representative of the Qing Dynasty textual research scholars, its solution method is clear, systematic and condensed, the most controversial in the later academic circles. They generally interpret their methodological explanation as a one-way method from reality to reality and from part to whole, which is a kind of purely textualism that divorces from the reality and especially excludes reader’s subjectivity, which neglects its “ ”, So as to increase some unwarranted controversies in today “ the dispute between Han and Song Dynasties ”. Moreover, criticizing Dai Zhen’s one-way methodology and textualism for himself is really caught up in purely textualism, which is even more detrimental to the in-depth study of Dai Xue. A Dai Zhen scholarship pragmatics dimension Dai Zhen in Qianlong fourteen or fifteen years ① twenty-seven years old made