《兰亭后序》真的与兰亭雅集无关?

来源 :中国书法 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
通常认为孙绰在东晋永和九年的兰亭雅集中,不仅赋了两首兰亭诗,而且写了一篇《兰亭后序》。这篇后序,如王羲之的《兰亭序》,当时未加题目,到清人严可均辑《全晋文》时,被题作《三月三日兰亭诗序》。二〇一二年,第二辑《励耘学刊(文学卷)》发表了周燕的一篇题为《孙绰〈三月三日兰亭诗序〉并非兰亭后序》的文章,力主孙绰《兰亭后序》与兰亭雅集无关。对此,本文经过认真辨析,以为周文观点并不能令人信服,孙绰《兰亭后序》仍可视为兰亭雅集的重要文献。 Generally believed that Sun Chuo in East Jin Yong nine years of Lanting Ya focus, not only given two Lanting poetry, but also wrote an “Lanting sequence.” This sequence, such as Wang Xizhi’s “Orchid Pavilion Preface,” was not titled at the time. When the Qing Dynasty was able to edit both the “Complete Jin Wen”, it was titled “Preface to the Orchid Pavilion March 3”. In 2012, the second series, “Li Yun Journal (Literary Volume),” published an article by Zhou Yan entitled “Sun Chuo’s Orchid Pavilion Preface on March 3” Chuo “Lanting” Lanting Pavilion has nothing to do. In this regard, the paper after careful analysis, that Zhou Wen’s point of view is not convincing, Sun Chuo “Lanting sequence” can still be regarded as an important literature Lanting Collection.
其他文献
期刊
期刊
期刊
目的 探讨老年患者行无痛胃镜检查的安全管理方法.方法 对849例老年患者在异丙酚静脉麻醉诱导下进行胃镜检查,检查前做好健康评估,检查中做好严密监测,麻醉药用量要少1~1.5 mg
期刊
本文通过对荣华二采区10
期刊
期刊
本文通过对荣华二采区10
期刊
期刊
期刊