骨折是法医临床学鉴定工作中常见的损伤类型,然而对骨质疏松基础上骨折的损伤程度评定存在一定争议。有观点认为此类情况为伤病共存不适于评定损伤程度,而亦有人认为老年性骨质疏松为生理现象,患有骨质疏松的老年人仍属于正常人范畴,因此适于评定损伤程度。针对此争议,笔者作以下探讨。 Fracture is a common type of injury in clinical forensic work of forensic medicine. However, there is some controversy about the assessment of the degree of fracture on the basis of osteoporosis. Some people think that such coexistence of injuries and illnesses is not suitable for assessing the degree of injury, while others think that senile osteoporosis is a physiological phenomenon. Older people with osteoporosis still belong to the normal category and are therefore suitable for assessing the degree of injury. In response to this controversy, the author made the following discussion.