我国现行法律中有类似于“自甘风险”的法条,但并未明确的引入到立法实践当中。实际解决运动伤害案件中的理论选择问题上应当如何合理适用上述法律条文、理论并没有较为统一的观点。本文试图在此问题上,通过以现实运动类型化研究,做出不同的理论选择与搭配,试图探索理论选择的规律性,以期对侵权责任法,尤其是体育运动伤害法律制度的完善有所裨益。 In our current law, there is a law similar to “self-willingness risk ”, but it is not explicitly introduced into legislative practice. How to reasonably apply the above legal provisions on the theoretical choice of the cases of sports injuries should not have a unified view. This article tries to explore the regularity of theoretical choices by making different theoretical choices and collocations based on the study of the types of realistic sports, in the hope of benefiting the law of tort liability, especially the sports injury legal system .