论文部分内容阅读
在司法鉴定实践中,对同一个专门性问题,经过多次鉴定出现有争议的不同结论是不足为奇的,其中原因很多。司法机关在审查评断鉴定结论时,必须按照评断证据的“三性”原则和科学技术标准来分辨其中的是非,而不是实行盲目“优先”。在我国少数地方立法和司法研究当中,对这种有争议的鉴定结论提出实行“证明效力优先”原则,这属于认识误区,评断鉴定结论正确与否必须采用科学技术客观标准。
In forensic practice, it is not surprising to find different controversial conclusions on the same issue of specialization for many reasons, for a number of reasons. When examining the conclusion of judgment and appraisal, the judiciary must distinguish the right and the wrong among them according to the “three nature” principle and scientific and technological criteria of the judgment evidence, instead of implementing blind “priority”. Among the few local legislative and judicial studies in our country, this controversial appraisal concluded that the principle of “giving priority to the validity of the proof” should be implemented. This is a misunderstanding. Judgment and appraisal conclusion must adopt objective criteria of science and technology.