贾谊对秦暴政的批判,向为人们所注目,但他对秦与汉初“乱政”的抨击,却常常被忽视,或者是将上述两种批判归而为一。这导致了对贾谊礼治政治思想的不能深入理解。一尽管对“汉承秦制”理解不同(见朱永康文《“汉承秦制”说质疑》,《上海师大学报》1987年2期),但无论怎样看,那都不是一句毫无根据的虚辞。黄仁宇在《赫逊河畔谈中国历史》中多次指出,古代中国的帝国往往是先创造一个中央政权,而后向全国笼盖过去。其中 Jia Yi criticized the tyranny of the Qin regime for people’s attention, but his criticism of the “chaos” by the Qin and Han dynasties was often overlooked or the two critics were grouped together. This led to the in-depth understanding of Jia Yi’s rule of law. Although it has a different understanding of “Han Cheng Qin System” (see Zhu Yongkang’s article, “Han Cheng Qin System,” “Questioning”, “Shanghai Normal University Newspaper” 1987, 2), it is not a word According to the rhetoric. Huang Renyu pointed out many times in “Husun ​​Riverside History of China” that in ancient China, the empire often first created a central government and later covered the whole country. among them