中西医结合治疗粘连性肠梗阻88例的临床观察

来源 :中国实用医药 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:bladehit
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的本实验旨在探讨通肠丸结合西医疗法治疗粘连性肠梗阻的优越性。方法 176例入选病例随机分为对照组和治疗组,每组88例,对照组采用西医常规治疗。治疗组在采取与对照组相同治疗措施基础上加用通肠丸。两组均治疗一个疗程为7d。观察两组患者的总体疗效。结果治疗组治愈24例(68.19%),显效18例(20.46%),有效8例(9.09%)无效2例(2.28%),总有效率97.72%;对照组治愈50例(56.82%),显效15例(17.05%),有效13例(14.77%),无效10例(11.36%),总有效率88.64%;治疗组疗效优于对照组(P<0.01),具有统计学意义,治疗组与对照组均无不良反应。结论中西医结合治疗粘连性肠梗阻效果确切,优于单一西药治疗。 Objective The purpose of this experiment is to investigate the superiority of Tongchang pills combined with Western medical treatment for adhesive intestinal obstruction. Methods One hundred and sixty-six selected cases were randomly divided into control group and treatment group, 88 cases in each group. The control group was treated routinely with western medicine. Treatment group in the same treatment with the control group based on the use of Tongchang pill. Both groups were treated for a course of 7d. The overall efficacy of the two groups was observed. Results In the treatment group, 24 cases (68.19%) were cured, 18 cases (20.46%) were markedly effective, 8 cases (9.09%) were effective and 2 cases (2.28% 15 cases (17.05%) were effective, 13 cases (14.77%) were effective, 10 cases (11.36%) were ineffective, and the total effective rate was 88.64%. The curative effect in treatment group was better than that in control group (P <0.01) No adverse reactions with the control group. Conclusion Integrated Chinese and Western medicine treatment of adhesive intestinal obstruction effect is better than single western medicine treatment.
其他文献
主要阐述了北京谱仪Ⅲ(BESⅢ)事例起始时间计算系统的基本原理和程序结构;利用MDC径迹、TOF信息联合计算方法和单独使用MDC方法完成BESⅢ事例起始时间的计算。通过蒙特卡罗数
该文从挂篮荷载计算、施工流程、支座及临时固结施工、挂篮安装及试验、合拢段施工、模板制作安装、钢筋安装、混凝土的浇筑及养生、测量监控等方面人手,介绍了S226海滨大桥
期刊
期刊
期刊
采用络合——焙烧——分解法制备的镨钕混合酯化催化剂,其比表面扩大近5倍.用于催化合成DOA,用量下降60%.
期刊
目的:研究中药蛇伤胶囊治疗竹叶青蛇伤患者凝血功能障碍的机制。方法采用前瞻性研究方法,将70例竹叶青蛇伤且符合火毒证诊断标准的患者按随机数字表法分为治疗组和对照组,每组35
期刊
期刊