论文部分内容阅读
与黄侃《文心雕龙札记》之备受推崇的盛况相比,其师章太炎的《文心雕龙》研究则鲜为人所知。我们借助上海博物馆所藏章太炎《文心雕龙》讲义与黄侃的《文心雕龙札记》进行对比研究,发现前者的确对后者产生了影响。而这种影响主要体现在四个方面,分别是对“文”的内涵进行了限定,抉发了刘勰借经救弊的深意,提供了札记体的写作范式,以及展示了校注的体例。黄侃在章太炎的基础上,继续对《文心雕龙》进行研究,取得了很大的成就。但我们在推崇这一成就的同时,理应对章太炎的龙学研究投以特别的关注和重视。
Compared with the much-respected praises of Huang Kan’s The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons, the study of Wen Xin Diao Long, whose teacher Zhang Yan is a lesser known person, is rarely known. Using the lecture of Zhang Taiyan’s Wen Xin Diao Long, which is a stamp of the Shanghai Museum, we compare it with that of Huang Wen’s Wen Xin Diao Long, and find that the former has indeed had an impact on the latter. And this kind of influence is mainly reflected in four aspects, which are respectively the limitation of the connotation of “Wen ”, the conclusion of Liu Xie’s salvation by means of salvation, the writing paradigm of reading notes and the way of displaying the school notes . Based on Zhang Taiyan, Huang Kan continued to study “Wen Xin Diao Long” and achieved great success. However, while we advocate this achievement, we should devote special attention and attention to Zhang Taiyan’s study of dragon learning.