论文部分内容阅读
刑法第三百一十三条在司法实践中的适用极少,很大程度上源于刑法理论上并未对刑法第三百一十三条与民事规避执行行为的区别予以充分讨论。本文通过结合司法实例,在对此问题进行刑法教义学分析的基础上,将有关结论与工程建设领域这一特殊领域的相关问题结合起来,得出的基本结论是:在判决、裁定要求行为人支付一定数额财产时,行为人有能力履行,但故意实施使应当执行的财产物理灭失或法律灭失的行为;或在判决、裁定要求行为人实施特定行为时,行为人经多次通知履行而拒不履行或故意设置障碍等情况时,构成刑法第三百一十三条之罪。
The application of Article 313 of the Criminal Law to judicial practice is extremely rare. It stems largely from the theory of criminal law and does not fully discuss the difference between the Article 313 of the Criminal Law and the conduct of civil evasion. Based on the analysis of the jurisprudence of criminal law on this issue, this paper combines the relevant conclusions with the relevant issues in the special field of engineering construction by combining with the judicial examples, and draws the basic conclusion that in the judgment and ruling, When a certain amount of property is paid, the perpetrator is capable of fulfilling it, but intentionally carries out the act of physically causing the property to be executed or the law to be destroyed; or when the judgment or ruling requires that the perpetrator commit a specific act, Failure to perform or deliberately set up an obstacle, etc., constitutes a crime of Article 313 of the Criminal Law.