论文部分内容阅读
南宋的学术思想比较活跃,不仅大兴讲学之风,而且还出现学术上相互争论的局面。陈亮与朱熹展开的一场关于“天理人欲”、“王霸义利”的论辩,较为集中的体现了他的功利思想。这场论辩在当时就产生了很大轰动,在中国思想史上也具有相当大的意义。朱熹(1130—1200)将中国的人文传统综合为新儒学,使之成为直至20世纪的中国学术界与官方的正统思想。陈亮(1143—1194)则代表功利主义的思潮,被12世纪新儒家的伦理学与形而上学所埋没,直到大部分中国人赞同功利主义取向并且指摘新儒学的20世纪他才声名鹊起1。本文将对陈亮重事功的功利思想的影响进行研究和总结。
Southern Song Dynasty academic thought is more active, not only the style of teaching, but also academic controversy. Chen Liang and Zhu Xi started a debate about “God’s natural desire ”, “Wangbaheyili ” argument, a more concentrated expression of his utilitarian thinking. This argument produced a great sensation at that time, and it also had considerable significance in the history of Chinese thought. Zhu Xi (1130-1200) integrated the humanistic tradition of China into Neo-Confucianism, making it an academic and official orthodoxy in China until the 20th century. Chen Liang (1143-1194), on behalf of utilitarianism, was buried by the neo-Confucian ethics and metaphysics of the 12th century until most of the Chinese people became famous for favoritism and accused Neo-Confucianism of the 20th century. This article will study and summarize the impact of Chen Liang’s retribution on utilitarianism.