论文部分内容阅读
近年来,我国医患纠纷频繁发生。我国多省市已开始探索医疗纠纷人民调解委员会制度这一第三方争议处理方式,但各地调解组织的运行、调解成果与影响力却相差悬殊。从该制度的实践情况看,由于当事人和解、行政调解、民事诉讼及仲裁等其他争议解决方式的存在,其存在必要性问题颇受质疑,但从社会心理的视角来看,该制度实有其存在必要性。本文以武汉市医调委为研究对象,探究其运行机制,以个体为例推广到全国,探求其优越性和所存在的缺陷,探求医疗纠纷人民调解的完善途径。
In recent years, frequent disputes between doctors and patients in our country occur. Many provinces and cities in our country have begun to explore the third-party dispute resolution system of People’s Mediation Commission System for Medical Disputes. However, the operation and mediation results of mediation organizations across the country differ greatly in their influence. Judging from the actual situation of the system, the existence of the question of its existence is questioned due to the existence of other dispute resolution methods such as parties’ reconciliation, administrative mediation, civil litigation and arbitration. However, from a social psychological point of view, There is a need. In this paper, Wuhan Medical Commission as the research object, to explore its operating mechanism, the individual as an example to promote the country, to explore its superiority and the existing shortcomings, to explore ways to improve medical dispute mediation.