我国专利法并未明确规定行为人的主观过错是否是认定专利侵权的必备要件。学界大致分为无过错说,过错说和混合说三种。TRIPS协议中规定以过错责任为主,无过错责任为辅。专利侵权责任和损害赔偿责任应分开讨论,并适用不同的归责原则。专利侵权责任应适用无过错原则,而损害赔偿责任应适用过错原则。 China’s patent law does not clearly stipulate whether the perpetrator’s subjective fault is an essential requirement for the determination of patent infringement. The academic community is broadly divided into no-fault, faulty and mixed. The TRIPS agreement stipulates that fault liability is the main responsibility and fault liability is not supplemented. The patent infringement liability and the liability for damages should be discussed separately and different principles of attribution should apply. The patent infringement liability should be applied to the principle of no fault, while the liability for damages should be applied to the principle of fault.