论文部分内容阅读
涉诉信访的权利救济功能与现代司法制度之间存在一种紧张关系,这导致涉诉信访的实践陷入困境,并影响其存在的正当性与合理性。由此应该以司法主体性理念为基础,通过将公民信访权进行法律定型,围绕公民信访权重建涉诉信访制度。虽然信访并不能解决所有信访者的问题,甚至实践中只能解决很少一部分,但是信访最大功效在于公民借此获得权利救济的可能。如果信访得到最高司法机关的关注甚而实现受损权利的修复,则更可能使得信访者重新产生或增加对司法的尊重。
There is a tension between the right relief function of petitioning letters and visits and the modern judicial system, which leads to the plight of petitioning letters and visits and the legitimacy and rationality of their existence. Therefore, based on the concept of judicial subjectivity, this article attempts to reconstruct the system of petitioning letters and petitions around the right of citizens ’letters and visits by legalizing the right of citizens’ letters and visits. Although petitioning can not solve the problem of all petitioners or even solve only a few cases in practice, the greatest effect of petitions lies in the possibility that citizens may obtain the right relief. If petitions are given the highest judicial attention and even the restoration of damaged rights, they are more likely to enable petitioners to regain or increase their respect for the judiciary.