论文部分内容阅读
本文分析了西方哲学史关于真理问题的一些逻辑论证,以及中国哲学史上的有关文本,探讨中西方的相关文本处理真理问题的方式,提供的论证。认为西方思想史关于真理问题的逻辑论证,和中国思想史上的相关论证,在处理方法和论证结构上有很多相似的地方;而且,双方的论证结论是一致的。并对造成中国思想史在庄子之后就完全搁置这个主题,销声匿迹的因素导进行了分析。
This paper analyzes some of the logical arguments about the truth in the history of western philosophy, as well as the relevant texts in the history of Chinese philosophy, and discusses the ways and the arguments provided by the relevant texts in the West to deal with the truth. The logical argumentation on the question of truth in the history of Western thought has much in common with the related argumentation in the history of Chinese thought in the way of handling and the structure of argument. Moreover, the conclusions of both sides of the argument are consistent. And analyzed the factors that led to the complete suspension of the theme of Chinese intellectual history after Zhuangzi disappeared.