承蒙邀约,不揣冒昧,呈上短文一则。不提供三万字长文,这也就罢了;竟然送上三千字的序言,是否故意怠慢?先声明,此文可发可不发,但这么做绝非搪塞,而是心有所感,希望你们不拘一格选文章。今日中国学刊,注释越来越规范,但八股气日浓。说不好听,除了编辑与作者,以及个别刚好对这个题目感兴趣的,其他人一概不读。前日读《文艺研究》2016年第2期,让我最感兴趣的,竟然是冯其庸先生的两则短文。事后想 Thanks to the offer, do not try to guess what to do, and give an essay. Not to provide 30,000 words long text, which also Bale; even sent a preamble to three thousand words, whether deliberately neglect? First statement, this article can not send hair, but this is by no means prevaricate, but feeling, hope You choose one article. Today’s Chinese journal, annotation more and more standardized, but vigorous. Say not good, in addition to editors and authors, and individual just interested in this topic, others will not read. Reading the day before yesterday, “Literature and Art Research” 2016 the second period, the one I am most interested in turned out to be two short essays by Mr. Feng Qianyong. Think afterwards