论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析有漏型慢性根尖周炎的临床疗效。方法:收集有漏型慢性根尖周炎患者164例,随机分为观察组和对照组,各82例,观察组行一次性根充术,对照组行传统的多次性根管治疗术,对比分析两组疗效。结果:观察组的治愈率以及治疗总有效率分别为89.0%、98.2%,均显著高于对照组的74.4%、85.4%,且观察组的症状消退时间以及牙齿功能恢复时间均显著短于对照组,P均<0.05。结论:一次性根充术用于治疗有漏型慢性根尖周炎疗效显著,疗程较短,可节约就诊时间,并减少复诊次数,值得推广应用。
Objective: To analyze the clinical effect of missed periapical periodontitis. Methods: One hundred and sixty-four patients with chronic periapical periodontitis were collected and randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 82 cases in each group. The observation group received one-time root-filling and the control group received conventional multiple root canal therapy. Analysis of two groups of curative effect. Results: The cure rate and the total effective rate in the observation group were 89.0% and 98.2%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those in the control group (74.4% and 85.4% respectively), and the symptom subsidence time and tooth function recovery time in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group Group, P <0.05. CONCLUSION: One-time root-filling is a effective and effective method for the treatment of chronic periapical periodontitis. The short course of treatment can save the time for treatment and reduce the frequency of referral. It is worth popularizing and applying.