从文学伦理学批评方法出发,我们发现《父亲的法律》中存在父子和警匪两条伦理线,并呈现了混乱的父子关系、警匪关系以及各自的伦理选择。本文探讨了子辈的“弑父”及父辈的“护犊”等错综复杂的伦理关系,指出了作者身上所存在的矛盾。小说既肯定了当时社会语境下的“弑父”意愿,又否定了子辈的非道德行为,因此成为一部具有复杂伦理内涵的作品。 Starting from the method of literary ethics criticism, we find that there exist two ethical lines of father and son and cops and robbers in “Father’s Law”, and present chaotic father-son relationship, cops and robbers relations and their respective ethical choices. This article explores the intricate ethical relations such as “father” of father and father and “father of calf”, pointing out the contradictions existing in the author. The novel not only affirmed the wishes of “father” in the social context at the time, but also denied the non-moral behavior of the elders, thus becoming a work with complex ethical connotations.