患者知情同意的适用范围,在美国也仍有争议,从外科领域到侵袭性,从侵袭性到似乎不受限制。手术并不是知情同意的当然范围,比较简单的一级手术是否知情同意需综合考量;侵袭性可以作为手术的补充标准,采用风险说比较合理,但仍应受发生危险的可能性、损害后果的严重性限制;任何医疗行为都应知情同意的观点,没有可能,也无必要。 The scope of informed consent of patients is still controversial in the United States, from the surgical field to aggressive and from invasive to seemingly unrestricted. Surgery is not the scope of the informed consent of a relatively simple first-line consent is required for comprehensive consideration; invasive surgery can be used as a supplementary standard, the risk that more reasonable, but still subject to the possibility of danger, the consequences of damage Severity Limitations; The notion that any medical practice should be informed is not possible or necessary.