论文部分内容阅读
1993年6月5日,安徽省某县公安局消防科科长姚某和消防监督员朱某一起去县纺织厂进行消防安全检查。他们在检查中发现,该厂棉花仓库堆放超高、零乱,又直接靠墙,仓库地面不防潮,房顶又有漏雨现象,下脚棉受潮严重,有的已开始霉变。当时,他们即给厂方指出,现在已经进入梅雨季节,已经受潮霉变的下脚棉,长期堆放会自燃引起火灾,要求厂方立即将下脚棉处理掉,并增设干燥、通风设施。厂长孙某听后,不以为然。第二天,消防科正式对该厂发出了《火险隐患整改通知书》,限纺织厂在二十天内消除隐患。 6月25日,消防科到纺织厂检查火险隐患整改情况,见厂方没有采取任何措施,棉花仓库仍是原样,又一次口头要求厂方整改。但厂方
June 5, 1993, a county in Anhui Province Public Security Bureau Fire Chief Yao and fire supervisor Zhu together go to the county textile factory for fire safety inspection. They found in the inspection, the factory warehouse stacked cotton high, messy, but also directly against the wall, the warehouse is not damp ground, the roof has leaking phenomenon, under the foot damp cotton, and some have begun to mold. At that time, they pointed out to the factory that they have now entered the rainy season and have already suffered from mildew and mildew. Long-term piling up will cause spontaneous combustion and require the factory to immediately dispose of the battered cotton and add drying and ventilation facilities. After the director Sunmou listen, disagree. The next day, Fire Department formally issued a “notice of rectification of fire risks” to the factory, limiting the mill to eliminate hidden dangers in twenty days. On June 25, Fire Department went to the textile factory to check the rectification of potential fire hazards. See the factory did not take any measures. The cotton warehouse is still intact. Once again, the factory required rectification. But the factory