论文部分内容阅读
最高人民法院近期围绕“修改超范围”的一系列判断体现了其在该问题认识上与专利行政机关的显著差异。但是对于大量申请下早已重担在肩的专利行政机关来说,坚持修改超范围的“形式性判断”更加有利于审查效率性的维持;同时对于司法机关来说,如何在专利审查问题上谦抑地表达相关司法政策,也值得更加审慎的思考。本文在明确“形式性判断”与“实质性判断”的分歧与适用的基础上,提出一种偏向“形式性判断”的处理方法,以期恰当地实现“修改超范围判断”的制度功能。
A series of judgments recently taken by the Supreme People’s Court on “changing beyond the scope” show significant differences from the patent administrations on this issue. However, for a large number of patent administrative organs that have long been shouldered by the application, it is even more conducive to the maintenance of the efficiency of examination when insisting on revising the out-of-scope “formal judgment.” At the same time, for the judicial organ, Modest expression of relevant judicial policies, it is also worth more cautious thinking. Based on the disagreement and application of “formal judgment” and “substantive judgment”, this paper puts forward a method of handling bias towards “formal judgment”, in order to properly achieve the goal of “ Judgment ”system function.