论文部分内容阅读
今天的工人和馬克思时代的工人大不相同了。工业的发展已經改变了劳动,社会法改变了城市安全。根据三个观点:生存、安全、提高地位和文化技术水平,经过一次調查研究以后,我們可以更好地从那个把工人現象和阶级現象联系起来的关系中辨别出过了时的和永久性的关系。要解决工人的吃饭問题,首先应該等待工业发展到达一定的水平,而不必求助于推翻敌对阶級政权的革命。工业的发展解决了整个生活問題,并把这些問題变为生活水平的問題,从而使工人阶級转化为“民众团体”,如果工人現象分割成人民現象,阶級变成了团体,那末,还談什么阶級現象呢?至多把它看成是一个副現象罢了。阶级现象是結构矛盾的有力表現,因此,工人現象,阶級現象和无产阶级現象的巧合是机会的偶然,是局部的。社会阶級的划分不必要把所有的人都包括进去,敌对阶级也不必要在同一个时期里都具体化起来。职員、农民和“民众团体”。今天看来是社会动力的两个主要极端。各自在不同的时間内成为一个具体的阶級。
The workers today are very different from those in the Marxist era. Industrial development has changed labor, and social law has changed urban safety. According to three viewpoints: survival, security, advancement and cultural and technological level. After a survey study, we can better distinguish the outdated and the permanent from the relationship that links the phenomenon of workers and class phenomena relationship. To solve the problem of workers’ meals, we must first wait for the industrial development to reach a certain level without resorting to the revolution that overthrew the hostile class regime. Industrial development has solved the entire problem of living and transformed these problems into problems of standard of living so that the working class can be transformed into a “mass group.” If the phenomenon of workers is divided into phenomena of people and classes become groups, then What kind of class talk about it? Up to it as a side effect. Class phenomena are powerful manifestations of structural contradictions. Therefore, the coincidence of the phenomenon of workers, class and proletariat is a chance and a partial one. The division of social classes does not have to include all of them, nor does the hostile class need to be materialized in the same period. Staff, peasants and “popular groups.” Today seems to be the two main extremes of social mobility. Each at a different time to become a specific class.