“强制阐释论”是近两年来引起学界强烈关注与呼应的一个论题(1),之所以如此,是因为这一论题触及到了现代文学理论知识生产、话语制造中的一些痛点。“强制阐释论”的反思性、建构性意向相当明确,现实性特征非常突出,在讨论的过程中,所关涉到的不外乎文学理论“何为”与“为何”这一长期困扰学界的问题,而更深层、更具体的问题,却是如何认识文学理论研究中知识和话语生产的阐释学原则与方法论问题。“强制阐释论”既 “Forced Interpretation Theory” is a topic that has aroused strong concern and echo in academia in the past two years (1). This is because this topic touches on some pain points in the production and discourse of modern literary theory. “Forced Interpretation ” of the reflective, constructive intentions quite clear, realistic features are very prominent in the course of the discussion, nothing more than related to the literary theory of “what is” and “why” This long-plagued academic issues, but deeper, more specific questions, but how to understand the literary theory of knowledge and discourse production of hermeneutic principles and methodological issues. “Forced interpretation theory ” both