论文部分内容阅读
《郑伯克段于鄢》为《左传》中典型一文,杜预和孔颖达对该文都做出了较多的阐释。通过对《郑伯克段于鄢》杜注和孔疏的逐条对比和分析,可以发现孔颖达的正义有只申解传文、只申解杜注和既申解传文又阐述杜注三种类型,一定程度上打破了传统“疏不破注”的原则。在时代及自身的原因下,杜预注呈现简约精当、敢于创见的特点。孔疏在坚持“疏不驳注”原则的基础上,间接委婉地阐述自己的理解,论证资料详备,但也有迂曲之嫌。
“Zheng Bock in Yu Yan” as “Zuo Zhuan” in a typical text, Du pre-Kong and Kong Ying Da have made more of the text interpretation. Through the comparison and analysis of Du Zheng and Cheng Shu of “Cheng Burke’s Paragraph Yuanyan”, we can find that Kong Yingda’s justice has only the explanation of the passage, only the explanation of the Du and the interpretation of the three types of Du-note, to a certain extent The traditional “sparse not broken note ” principle. In the era and its own reasons, Du pre-note presents simple and sophisticated, daring to creative features. On the basis of insisting on the principle of “refusing to refute”, Kong Shu indirectly and indirectly expounded his own understanding. The data of the argument are well-specified, but there are also suspense.