常听有人告诫我们,对某一言、某一事要“全面理解”云云。全面理解比不全面理解或片面理解更好、更正确,这几乎是毫无疑义的——然而,也不一定是这样。多年前,曾读过托洛茨基的《不断革命》,别的都记不清了,唯一印象最深刻的是书中记述的一个小插曲:有一次布哈林在演讲,引用列宁“这样说”以论证自己的观点,这时,在听众席上的托洛茨基站起来大声异议:“可是,在别的地方列宁那样说过”。布哈林一点也不窘,从容不迫地回答:“我知道,我知道,但 We often hear people warn us that we must ”understand and understand“ a certain word or thing. It is almost undoubted that a full understanding is better and more correct than not understanding or understanding one-sidedly. However, this is not necessarily the case. Many years ago, I read Trotsky’s ”Continuity Revolution.“ Others couldn’t remember. The only thing that was most impressive was an episode written in the book: When Bukharin was giving a speech, he quoted Lenin.” In this way, “To prove his point of view, Trotsky’s base station in the audience stood up and disagreed:” However, in other places Lenin said that. Bukharin is not embarrassed at all and calmly answers: "I know, I know, but